[6] It is a myth that the world economy can continue as usualKolkata Investment. d to debt bubbles crashing design

Also, from the low tech article you link to,

The Global Iron and Steel Industry Consumes More Energy and Produces More Carbon Emissions than Any Other Industry. CTION WAS 39 Exajoules (EJ) in 2021, Which Corresponds to 7% of All Energy USEdwide in that year(595 EJ). The Greenhouse Gas Emissions are ever beCAUSE AROUND 75% of Energy Use Comes from Coal - The Fuel with the Highest Carbon EmissionsUdabur Wealth Management. And Steel Industry Produced 3.3 GT of Carbon Emissions, ROUGHLY 9% ofGlobal Emissions (36.3 GT) .12 The Concrete Industry Follows Closly with 8%.

The Estimates Above Come from the World Steel Association and the International Energy Agecy. These data are available for all metals and has documented over a long. ERIOD, Allowing for Historical Comparisons. However, they only referring of the metal.Not Include The Energy Use and Carbon Emissions for Mining and Transporting Iron Ore, COAL, LiseStone, SCRAP, and Steel ProductsIndore Investment. NOR Do they Include the Energy and EM Issions for coke propuction and ore preparation -all essential to the steel product process.

Scientific Studies that have set wider Bounder Boundaries for the Iron and Steel Industry ConClude that the Energy Cost of Steel Production Increases by 50%. One Concludes that the methane emissions from metallurgical coal mining alone cores by 27%. Another StudyEstimates that seaborne transport of Iron Ore and Steel ADDS 10-15% Extra Emissions. Use, solid waste product, and significant Air and Water Pollution...

..recently, Efficience Gains have decreased, and there is a scientific consensus thatcurrent Technologies have reacked theirmodynamic limits. During He Last Two Decades, The Average Energy Use for the Production of 1 Ton of Steel Has Remained Around 20 GJ/T.Then, then

The section steel and wind power starts out:Agra Stock

The Most Steel-Intensive Power Source-by Far-is the modeln wind turbineGuoabong Stock. The Stel Intensity of a Wind Turbine Depends on its size. s Significantly More Steel Per Megawatt of Installed Power than Two Smaller Wind Turbines.36 For Example, A 3.6 MW Wind Turbine with A 100-Meter Tall Tower Requires 335 Tons of Steel (83 Tons/MW), While A 5 MW Wind Turbine with A 150-METER TALL News 875 Tons of Steel (175 Tons/Mw) .37 The Trend is Towards Taller Wind Turbines and a Higher Steel Intensity.

Steel Consumption FRETHER Increases for Offshore Wind Turbines. ONSHORE WIND POIND POLAR PLELECED Concrete for their Foundations, But Office Wind Turbines Ed Massive Steel Structures Such as Monopiles and Jackets. The Steel Intensity for Offshore Wind Turbines is Calculated to Be Around 450 Tonnes Per.MW for a 5 MW Turbine - Eight Times Higher than the Steel Intensity of a Theermal Power Plant. As these Wind Turbines Get Taller and Move Into Deeper Waters, Their Steel sefurther increases.

The Difference Between Renewable Power Sources and Fossil Fuels Even Larger If The Stel Innsity is Calculated Per UNIT of Energy Rather (MWH Intea d of mw). In Contraast to Coal and Gas Power Plants, The Output of Wind and Solar Power Plants DependsOn the weather, and they do not alway their maximum power capacity. The replacing 1 mw of Fossil Electricity Capacity Requires the Stallation of (on AVERAGE) 4 mW of Solar Power or 2 MW of Wind Power. A 14 MW Offshore WindTurbine this has a Steel intensity that is almost 50 Times higher than a fossil fuel power plants for every kilowattttttttr of electricity.

I Alway What Kind of Assumptions The EROEI FOLKS HAVE Been Making in THEIR ESTIMATES. They: Ed Return from all of this upfront easyate of resources has a very real core.